<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Usability Thoughts &#187; urls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://usabilitythoughts.com/tag/urls/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://usabilitythoughts.com</link>
	<description>content meets user</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:02:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Friendly URLs</title>
		<link>http://usabilitythoughts.com/friendly-urls.html</link>
		<comments>http://usabilitythoughts.com/friendly-urls.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Good practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patterns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breadcrumbs.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[friendly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rewrite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[signposts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usabilitythoughts.com/?p=38</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Friendly URLs are are usability patterns if you want. Let me explain myself for a moment here.
When a user sees in his browser example.com?index.aspx?action=art&#038;id=7799&#038;cat=52&#038;p=2#a22 he simply ignores  that. That URL doesn&#8217;t give him any information at all. It&#8217;s a bunch of numbers, parameters, crazy signs.
When he sees example.com/kitchens/a-article-about-nice-kitchen-furniture.html#comment-no-22 on the other hand, the user [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Friendly URLs</strong> are are usability patterns if you want. Let me explain myself for a moment here.</p>
<p>When a user sees in his browser <em>example.com?index.aspx?action=art&#038;id=7799&#038;cat=52&#038;p=2#a22</em> he simply <strong>ignores  </strong>that. That URL doesn&#8217;t give him any information at all. It&#8217;s a bunch of numbers, parameters, crazy signs.</p>
<p>When he sees <em>example.com/kitchens/a-article-about-nice-kitchen-furniture.html#comment-no-22</em> on the other hand, the user kindda&#8217; guesses that he&#8217;s about to read an article about kitchen furniture, part of the kitchen articles category in the site. Hell, some computer-savy guys might know the browser will set on the 22nd comment to that article. </p>
<p><strong>URLs can act like breadcrumbs</strong>. It&#8217;s a signpost, a &#8220;You are here&#8221; marker. </p>
<p>Bonus: they are great for SEO, everybody knows that, and they are much more appealing esthetically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://usabilitythoughts.com/friendly-urls.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

