<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Usability Thoughts &#187; Patterns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://usabilitythoughts.com/tag/patterns/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://usabilitythoughts.com</link>
	<description>content meets user</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:02:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Amazing lookup feature on NYTimes Blogs</title>
		<link>http://usabilitythoughts.com/amazing-lookup-feature-on-nytimes-blogs.html</link>
		<comments>http://usabilitythoughts.com/amazing-lookup-feature-on-nytimes-blogs.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Good practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patterns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dictionary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usabilitythoughts.com/?p=178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was reading One Hundred Things Restaurant Staffers Should Never Do on a NY Times blog and i had no idea what the heck &#8220;amuse-bouche&#8221; is. I selected the word so I can copy and google it. 
The instance I selected the text a question mark appeared. Yeah, I don&#8217;t know what&#8217;s that. I click [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was reading <a href="http://boss.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/29/one-hundred-things-restaurant-staffers-should-never-do-part-one/?em">One Hundred Things Restaurant Staffers Should Never Do</a> on a NY Times blog and i had no idea what the heck &#8220;amuse-bouche&#8221; is. I selected the word so I can copy and google it. </p>
<p>The instance I selected the text a question mark appeared. Yeah, I don&#8217;t know what&#8217;s that. I click on the question mark and it opens a popup with a dictionary lookup  on the word. </p>
<div align="center"><img src="http://usabilitythoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/lookup_word.png" alt="lookup_word" title="lookup_word" width="396" height="112" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-179" /></div>
<p>OH, how natural this was!!! </p>
<p>PS: Turns out the &#8220;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amuse-bouche">amuse-bouche</a>&#8221; is some kind of appetizer. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://usabilitythoughts.com/amazing-lookup-feature-on-nytimes-blogs.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Overview on login forms</title>
		<link>http://usabilitythoughts.com/overview-on-login-forms.html</link>
		<comments>http://usabilitythoughts.com/overview-on-login-forms.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Good practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patterns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fields]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[login]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passwords]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usabilitythoughts.com/?p=67</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We discussed the other day about the login with email vs. username and I came to the conclusion that it depends on the type of the application, if it&#8217;s social, you&#8217;ll want username, if not, it&#8217;s better to only ask for the email.
Today we&#8217;ll take a look at login forms as a whole.  We&#8217;ll [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We discussed the other day about the <a href="http://usabilitythoughts.com/login-with-email-vs-username.html">login with email vs. username</a> and I came to the conclusion that it depends on the type of the application, if it&#8217;s social, you&#8217;ll want username, if not, it&#8217;s better to only ask for the email.</p>
<p>Today we&#8217;ll take a look at <strong>login forms</strong> as a whole.  We&#8217;ll see the good practices, the &#8220;dos&#8221; and &#8220;donts&#8221; with examples from a few major sites on the internet. I&#8217;m not saying there&#8217;s a right formula for all the sites but there are some things that need to be on every one of those login forms. </p>
<p>So, let&#8217;s cut the crap and get this going (because some of you only look at pictures and read bold text, and i know that).</p>
<h2>Examples:</h2>
<p><img src="http://usabilitythoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/amazon.png" alt="amazon" title="amazon" width="187" height="165" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-68" /> </p>
<p>Amazon.com get&#8217;s it <strong>simple</strong>. Two fields, a button and a &#8220;forgot password&#8221; link. That is all there is mandatory on a login form and that is what the guys at amazon put there, no more, no less. Authentication is made by email and password.</p>
<p><img src="http://usabilitythoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/cnet.png" alt="cnet" title="cnet" width="537" height="348" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-69" /></p>
<p>The next example is from cnet.com. They have a few more options: a <strong>register/join link</strong> (if you don&#8217;t have an account), a <strong>remember me checkbox</strong> and a feature i started to see on many websites, <strong>connect with facebook</strong>. I didn&#8217;t try but i guess you can use your facebook account which is great.</p>
<p><img src="http://usabilitythoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/digg.png" alt="digg" title="digg" width="616" height="281" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-70" /></p>
<p>Digg adopts a different way to show the form, a <strong>modal window</strong>. I personally hate modals, i think they require useless clicks. They have also a &#8220;create new account&#8221; as an alternative and offer a <strong>recover username</strong> option. Looks nice and clean.</p>
<p><img src="http://usabilitythoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/ebay1.png" alt="ebay1" title="ebay1" width="371" height="403" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-71" /></p>
<p>Ebay.com has 4 links in the login form, a bit too much if you ask me. They also have a &#8220;<strong>keep me signed in for today</strong>&#8221; option and some advices to avoid others entering your account or phishing attacks. They have a history there, it&#8217;s normal. </p>
<p><img src="http://usabilitythoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/elance.png" alt="elance" title="elance" width="374" height="361" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-72" /></p>
<p>Elance.com adds a radio button option because there are 2 types of accounts, there is one <strong>checked by default</strong> so it&#8217;s quite ok. There is a locked icon with no title on the link so a user  does not know what it does until it clicks. Does it lock your account? </p>
<p><img src="http://usabilitythoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/facebook.png" alt="facebook" title="facebook" width="414" height="78" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-73" /></p>
<p>Facebook login is also simple: remember me, forgot password and login. I think they could do better than a <strong>blue button on a blue background</strong>. </p>
<p><img src="http://usabilitythoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/google.png" alt="google" title="google" width="371" height="301" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-74" /></p>
<p>Google accounts it&#8217;s also quite simple, they have a &#8220;remember me on this computer&#8221; checkbox, a &#8220;create account&#8221; alternative and a rather unusual link for password recovery named &#8220;<strong>i cannot access my account</strong>&#8220;. I think the title is quite natural.</p>
<p><img src="http://usabilitythoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/imdb.png" alt="imdb" title="imdb" width="598" height="220" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-75" /></p>
<p>IMDB has the <strong>ugliest login form i have ever seen</strong>, no CSS whatsoever, but, it gets the job done, i think. IMDB also lets you login with either username or email. Interesting, they let the user choose, or they switched a while back from username to email and that&#8217;s how they support the old accounts.</p>
<p><img src="http://usabilitythoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/live.png" alt="live" title="live" width="429" height="269" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-76" /> </p>
<p>Live.com (msn, hotmail etc) has some rather <strong>confusing</strong> login: they ask for a &#8220;live ID&#8221; and give an email as a example (if it weren&#8217;t for the example the users were doomed) and two &#8220;remember me&#8221; options: one for this computer and one for the password. This cant be good for a naive user. They also have a link for &#8220;using advanced security&#8221; whatever that is.</p>
<p><img src="http://usabilitythoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/myspace.png" alt="myspace" title="myspace" width="310" height="188" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-77" /></p>
<p>Myspace has a really nice idea for offering an alternative to login, they made two <strong>tabs with login and signup</strong>, the login is the default (used more). I like it. Also like the contrast of the login button, well done.</p>
<p><img src="http://usabilitythoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/newegg.png" alt="newegg" title="newegg" width="593" height="260" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-78" /></p>
<p>Newegg is hustling as little the customers, it offers a <strong>&#8220;subscribe&#8221; checkbox on login</strong>, that can be frustrating when you log in often. They also offer the option to create a new account and they <strong>describe a little the benefits</strong> of doing that. I dont like the fact the buttons have the same weight. Which is more important, the login or the signin? <img src='http://usabilitythoughts.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p><img src="http://usabilitythoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/nytimes1.png" alt="nytimes1" title="nytimes1" width="600" height="263" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-86" /></p>
<p>NYTimes.com <strong>moves the focus on new members</strong> (see the background, position, colors), i guess we know who&#8217;s more important for them. I don&#8217;t say it&#8217;s wrong, growing the userbase is the most important thing for a content website, so they act like it. </p>
<p><img src="http://usabilitythoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/twitter.png" alt="twitter" title="twitter" width="214" height="324" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-80" /></p>
<p>Twitter has a pretty weird login if you ask me, it has a confusing name (&#8221;sign in&#8221;) which sounds a lot like &#8220;sign up&#8221; and  it has a <strong>big red &#8220;watch a video&#8221; button</strong>. C&#8217;mooon, if I have a twitter account I kind of know what it does, don&#8217;t I?</p>
<p><img src="http://usabilitythoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/wordpress.png" alt="wordpress" title="wordpress" width="189" height="188" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-81" /></p>
<p>Wordpress has a nice simple form, and they have a tooltip with &#8220;<strong>This is a secure form</strong>&#8221; on the damn icon. Nicely done. They don&#8217;t offer a register alternative in the form but there&#8217;s no need, there&#8217;s a HUGE blue &#8220;sign up&#8221; button on the page.</p>
<p><img src="http://usabilitythoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/wsj.png" alt="wsj" title="wsj" width="338" height="106" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-82" /></p>
<p>Wallstreet Journal has a <strong>sliding form</strong> when you click login, nice and very space saving&#8230; buuut&#8230;. when you click login and the form slides down, it disables the register link, so you&#8217;ll have to wait until it slides back up or you click login again to toggle the form.</p>
<p><img src="http://usabilitythoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/yahoo.png" alt="yahoo" title="yahoo" width="261" height="512" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-83" /></p>
<p>Yahoo dealt with so much problems in the past (account stealing, phishing etc) that they made up a <strong>&#8220;seal&#8221; system</strong> to protect you, you upload a picture which will be saved and will set a cookie on your browser so when you come back to login you&#8217;ll see the picture and know it&#8217;s not a phishing site. I dont know how many people actually use this, I don&#8217;t.</p>
<h2>Conclusions:</h2>
<p>- keep it simple, the more options you add, the more confused your users will be<br />
- I strongly suggest you keep a login form on every page of your website, if the site requires users to login often. One click away forms are &#8230; one click away.<br />
- the button must be a button, a &#8220;call to action&#8221;, use colors, contrast, spacing<br />
- make sure the form can be used from the keyboard and submitted with Enter<br />
- password recovery option is mandatory<br />
- offer a register alternative for users who don&#8217;t have accounts<br />
- make it visible, look at the ebay page below, it took me a while to find the link with all teh red things there. I&#8217;m not saying the user will leave without finding it, but it grows in frustration, and there is a limit for that.</p>
<p><img src="http://usabilitythoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/ebay_homepage.png" alt="ebay_homepage" title="ebay_homepage" width="600" height="420" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-84" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://usabilitythoughts.com/overview-on-login-forms.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is your 404 page usable enough?</title>
		<link>http://usabilitythoughts.com/is-your-404-page-usable-enough.html</link>
		<comments>http://usabilitythoughts.com/is-your-404-page-usable-enough.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 15:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Errors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patterns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[404]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usabilitythoughts.com/?p=6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are lots and lots of articles on 404 pages and creative solutions for that. I was reading (looking at it to be more exact) today a post on Pattern Tap  and i thought: What is a common user thinking when he sees:
&#8220;404 &#8211; Please update your bookmarks&#8221;

The common user has no freakin&#8217; idea [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are lots and lots of articles on 404 pages and creative solutions for that. I was reading (looking at it to be more exact) today <a href="http://patterntap.com/tap/pattern/197939021249a5d199584fd">a post on Pattern Tap</a>  and i thought: What is a common user thinking when he sees:</p>
<p>&#8220;<strong>404 &#8211; Please update your bookmarks</strong>&#8221;</p>
<p><img src="http://usabilitythoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/2009-03-06_1736.png" alt="2009-03-06_1736" title="2009-03-06_1736" width="502" height="349" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-7" /></p>
<p>The common user has no freakin&#8217; idea what &#8220;<strong>404</strong>&#8221; means. </p>
<p>The rest of the message is confusing also: &#8220;<strong>Please update your bookmarks</strong>&#8220;. <em>Huh? bookmark? what bookmark? my bookmark? what&#8217;s a bookmark? Have i done something wrong? Is it me? Oh man, i fucked up, didn&#8217;t I?<br />
</em><br />
The 404 message must be clear: &#8220;<strong>The page you&#8217;re looking for does not exist, either you came on a broken link or the page was deleted in the meantime</strong>&#8221; or something like that, in plain english so your mother could understand it. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://usabilitythoughts.com/is-your-404-page-usable-enough.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

