<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Usability Thoughts &#187; next</title>
	<atom:link href="http://usabilitythoughts.com/tag/next/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://usabilitythoughts.com</link>
	<description>content meets user</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:02:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Usable pagination</title>
		<link>http://usabilitythoughts.com/usable-pagination.html</link>
		<comments>http://usabilitythoughts.com/usable-pagination.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Good practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patterns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[next]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pagination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usabilitythoughts.com/?p=35</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You would think the most visited sites in the world would have perfect or close to perfect pagination systems, because let&#8217;s face it, the users browse a lot (that&#8217;s how the websites became most visited in the first place). Well&#8230; not really. Although there are good examples, none of them seem perfect to me. Some [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You would think the most visited sites in the world would have perfect or close to perfect pagination systems, because let&#8217;s face it, the users browse a lot (that&#8217;s how the websites became most visited in the first place). Well&#8230; not really. Although there are good examples, none of them seem perfect to me. Some of them fit the content of the sites they&#8217;re on pretty good, google search for example &#8211; it doesn&#8217;t need anything else, it&#8217;s stripped to the skin. </p>
<p><a href="http://usabilitythoughts.com/examples/pagination/"><img src="http://usabilitythoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/pagination.png" alt="pagination" title="pagination" width="599" height="279" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-36" /></a></p>
<p>My personal favorite is ebay. It is the only one which jas a &#8220;jump to&#8221; feature &#8211; very useful from my point of view when you have lots of pages (maybe filters too). What ebay lacks is links to first and last pages &#8211; a quick way to change the order of browsing. </p>
<p><strong>The links on pages</strong> &#8211; it&#8217;s preferable to have well defined click areas with a few px of padding. It&#8217;s damn hard to click those little numbers. Many sites go with the square like links &#8211; they are very good, easy to click, follow, see.</p>
<p><strong>Next &#8211; Prev buttons</strong> &#8211; should have indicators: arrows, < >, &laquo; &raquo; or anything suggesting the direction. The user sees and evaluates these things a lot faster than the word &#8220;Next&#8221; or &#8220;Previous&#8221;.</p>
<p><strong>Positioning </strong>- bottom of the content is mandatory, but in sites with heavy browsing i suggest duplicating it at the top too. If you have 30 products on a page it takes more to load them and scroll down, so a pagination at the top will increase the speed of navigation.</p>
<p>Here are <a href="http://usabilitythoughts.com/examples/pagination/">the examples</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://usabilitythoughts.com/usable-pagination.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

