Comments for Usability Thoughts

Comment on Login with email vs. username by Moein

Moein — Tue, 13 Dec 2011 11:48:53 +0000

Well I had to implement a login form and the model for it
So let me tell you if the programmer isn’t lazy he can’t easily resolve this problem
I did it this way
I added a check box after the email saying if the user wants to use a username and if the check box is not checked then I generate a unique random username and save it in the table
Then the user can login either with email or the username(just like twitter)
And he can always change the username as he likes
Like this you can have the both side happy right?

Comment on Login with email vs. username by Joe Burke

Joe Burke — Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:30:57 +0000

I would say that email for login is the only appropriate method, but that does not remove, for some applications, the requirement of a username. The two should b e treated as separate entities used for different purposes.

Comment on Login with email vs. username by Mitchell Pilot

Mitchell Pilot — Thu, 02 Dec 2010 17:34:54 +0000

I don’t like email addresses as login IDs (although I see I am the outlier here).

The original concept of using both a login ID and password (as opposed to just a password as was done in the early days) is that the ID can be a public identifier and only the password need be kept private. Because of spam abuse, email addresses cannot be made public, thus making them a poor substitute for a user ID. Adding a “screen name” while still using the email address to login further complicates what should be very simple: your login ID is public, your password is private, your email address is a data item in your account (also private).

In my mind, the trend toward using email addresses as login identifiers is a touch of laziness on the part of website designers. As you mentioned, it avoids the problem of checking for duplicates, and of storing an additional data item (the username) in the database. It does this at the expense of using as a personal identifier something that was never meant to be that.

I will admit that I am biased because I use a disposable email service that assigns a different email address to every forum I visit; I have many email addresses and cannot remember any of them. I can remember my username (for the few sites that let me use one).

Comment on Login with email vs. username by Josh

Josh — Thu, 07 Oct 2010 18:11:02 +0000

I dislike screen names, but what about the privacy and usability concerns associated with using an email address to log in? Can I set up an account using steve@apple.com? If so, I’m not going to see communications about my account, and Steve’s going to get spammed.

If the site requires me to verify that I own the email address, that introduces an extra step and a bunch of friction as my signup is interrupted by the need to go find the email and click its link.

Also, if the email address is a unique account identifier, can I plug other people’s emails into the signup form and find out whether they have accounts already? Shouldn’t that be private information?

Comment on Login with email vs. username by Dork

Dork — Fri, 01 Oct 2010 08:13:14 +0000

i could think of some cons –

1) if username is the same as the one in the email address, i.e. @.com etc, the user actually needs to type the whole email address, probably double the number of characters or more.

2) i generally don’t like to be “made” to do something, and “making the users use a real name” probably won’t work. i wouldn’t put my real name anyway.

3) internet usernames – everyone has one. that’s the whole thing about the internet. for one, i don’t like to have to specify my actual full name, for anything really.

while i agree with the points you made, i think the best option is to give users a choice. some sites even go further to add in openID etc.

Comment on Login with email vs. username by Sandro Miguel Marques

Sandro Miguel Marques — Sun, 29 Aug 2010 01:51:35 +0000

Adrian, I plenty agree with you.

The simple login db table

Id
NickName
Email
Passwd

The login auth read Email and Passwd fields and the name displayed could be the Nickname

Simply is the best

Comment on Take on the new iPhone’s FaceTime by Adrian

Adrian — Tue, 08 Jun 2010 20:14:08 +0000

i don’t see how this feature is implemented different on the iphone than the rest of the phones.

Comment on Take on the new iPhone’s FaceTime by Dmitry Fadeyev

Dmitry Fadeyev — Tue, 08 Jun 2010 17:12:45 +0000

Tablet computers have exited for a long time, yet nobody used them. The iPad comes out and is an overnight success. Prior existence and failure of a technology doesn’t necessarily mean it is doomed to fail–it could well be that the implementation or the time for it was wrong.

Comment on Take on the new iPhone’s FaceTime by Adrian

Adrian — Tue, 08 Jun 2010 14:18:49 +0000

it’s exactly what commercials said when the service launched. People don’t use it.

Comment on Take on the new iPhone’s FaceTime by AlphabUX

AlphabUX — Tue, 08 Jun 2010 14:15:52 +0000

I agree this is useless when you want to give a call. But in a selected number of cases it might be very appreciated family on different continents, babies, sharing something going on right now…

Also the simplicity is key: no account to create, no need to log in anywhere. You give a phone call and if the person also have the necessary phone, you get this button to show up. It might just work.